What is Plant Sociability?

Change the way you see plant patterns for better design. My next Botanic Bootcamp session Designing with Sociability on November 10 at 6 pm CST will help you better understand how plants spread, how we can use sociability to create better plantings, and more. Plus, attendees will get a handy-dandy plant sociability list of plant species. Join early for a 20% discount OR become a member and save even more!

🌸 GROW WITH DESIGNING WITH SOCIABILITY
🌸 GROW WITH THE MEMBERSHIP

One of the challenges that gardeners face when creating naturalistic plantings is how to arrange plants.  Questions arise about what species should be combined together and how we can place them to maximize ecology and aesthetics while also minimizing maintenance.  

If we look to the natural world for inspiration and observe how plants grow in nature, we will see patterns.  One way that horticulturists have figured out how to describe these patterns is with the concept of plant sociability.  

What plant patterns do you see in this plant community? Do you see solo viburnums, waves of red blueberries, patches of grasses, and spears of goldenrods? We can explain these with sociability.

So, what is plant sociability? 

There are a few sources that give us a deeper understanding.

In Planting in a Post-wild World by Thomas Rainer and Claudia West where I first learned of this concept, they stated that plant sociability is “how far plants in the same population grow from each other,” and it “offers a good model for distinguishing which plants should be massed versus which should be placed individually.”  

Brandon George’s incredible capstone project stated that plant sociability is “a measure of the distribution pattern and organization of the [plant] species.”

Nigel Dunnett added in The Dynamic Landscape that sociability helps us understand “the degree of massing that the species shows in the wild.”

And in the original Hansen and Stahl’s Perennials and Their Garden Habits, they dance around a definition saying that “it remains important to group the various species according to their inherent sociability, always taking nature as a guide.”  

What they lack in defining it they make up for by creating a sociability classification system.  Hansen and Stahl gave us five levels along a gradient to classify sociability.  Level 1 is for plants that occur solitary, and Level 5 is for thick stands of a species. From their book they give these categories,

  • 1 singly or in small clusters

  • 2 small groups of 3–10 plants

  • 3 larger groups of 10–20 plants

  • 4 extensive planting in patches

  • 5 extensive plantings over large areas

There are also a few pages of plant classifications along with how far apart to space plants per meter.    

Outside of these sources, there’s not much available in the research literature on plant sociability, which is a shame.  As one newsletter reader emailed me, everyone seems to talk about this magic approach to grouping plants and yet there is much lacking on the approach.  So, here are a few things I keep in mind.  

A SIMPLE ANALOGY FOR PLANT SOCIABILITY

I like to think about sociability like watching how people sit on an empty plane with no assigned seats.  

Some people come in and space out as they sit solitary.  Others get on and claim rows as small groups, say a family of four with grandparents in tow.  And, then there’s the whole sports team that takes up a third of the plane all sitting together, weaving themselves around the singletons and small groups.

On the plane, people sit in these patterns based on their connection with each other (family, relationships) and the environment (what seats are available when purchasing; the resources needed (aka dolla dolla bill y’all) for a first class versus a middle seat).  

For plants, they grow in patterns because there is an interaction with their connection to each other (in this case plant genetics influencing how they spread and reproduce) and the environment (what spots are available to grow; amounts of resources of light, water, and nutrients; etc.), too.  

Unlike our plane example where the greatest in number would be those flying solo or in small groups, plants with low sociability usually constitute the lower numbers in the community, and plants with higher sociability tend to be more dominant and plentiful.  

Pick your seat. In this space we see Asclepias tuberosa (orange milkweed) spaced out as a low sociability plant.

Don’t be confused by the numbers

I’m not trying to reinvent the wheel here, but I think that numbers Hansen and Stahl use can be lost on some people because they have to memorize what 1 or 5 means.  So I like to add the descriptors to sociability levels—very low (1), low (2), medium (3), high (4), and very high (5).  I think that it helps amateurs better think through whether their plants should be treated as loners, light minglers, or gregarious party animals.

Numbers can also shift slightly based on growing conditions.  Higher levels of sociability are usually associated with richer resources. For example, a wet site might shift a low (2) or medium (3) sociability up to a high level (4). But, the extremes usually don’t move to the other end. A species with very low sociability will likely never reach very high sociability, and it would look a bit odd if it did. And, species that have very high sociability planted as a single plant aren’t living up to their full potential. Give them 40 years and then they’ll be carpeting the ground.

This planting of Yucca (yucca) was done for a modernist effect, but it looks a bit odd because as a low sociability species it should not be planted so close. It would have been more effective to randomly scatter clumps in the Sporobolus (prairie dropseed) matrix.

Sociability HELPS gardeners DESIGN AND PLANT BETTER

I think too often we gardeners are in the habit of creating gardens that are plant collections of single plants or as Tony Avent calls this approach, “drifts of one.”  I know that I have been still am guilty of it. I mean, it wasn’t my fault I had to grow and trial so many different species to see what would die, survive, and thrive here in east Texas.  At least, that’s what I tell myself.

Now that interest is growing in naturalistic planting, we can’t apply that same approach. We can’t plant singletons far apart and then just pour mulch around the plants. There needs to be some level of coherence and legibility. Otherwise, the planting can look chaotic.

When you consider sociability in design, you’re not going to the garden center and buy one each of 40 different species.  Instead, you pick a few plants with very low/low sociability to stand out, a few groups of medium sociability to keep the seasonal interest going through the year, and many plugs of the high/very high sociability patch formers. 

A naturalistic planting at Epic campus in Wisconsin. Note how some species like the Symphyotrichum (aster) are grouped together while others occur singly.

It may be hard to invest money on 30-50% of the plants that are going to just be green groundcovers with high/very high sociability. And, sure you could wait for those plants that typically grow in higher sociability to increase in number, but having one Carex texensis (Texas sedge), Packera aurea (golden groundsel), or Pachysandra procumbens (Allegheny spurge) is just going to look weird.  We are used to seeing them in larger groups instead of isolated.

Sociability also helps us understand and anticipate how a species will spread and perform in the garden. For example, Helianthus angustifolius is a Level 4 (high) sociability plant. I planted two a few years ago in my garden, and they quickly began to spread via rhizomes and seed. Now I have tons of it.

And, something like Yucca rostrata that has lower sociability will look best if it’s more isolated. I shouldn’t anticipate it quickly spreading around.

Helianthus angustifolius (swamp sunflower) blooms in autumn. Even though I planted a couple, this high sociability species has made its presence known in my garden.

PRACTICE SEEING SOCIABILITY

If this concept is new to you, start practicing applying it today.  Walk through a natural area or your garden, and pay attention to which species occur in groups small or big group and which plants stand alone.

That mental shift will help you start seeing your plantings as a community, and that’s the first step toward designing with sociability. Once you start seeing those relationships, you’ll never look at your garden or nature the same way again.

An Epic Visit to Epic Campus: Part 1

A few weeks ago, I shared that during my trip to Wisconsin to speak to the Wisconsin Hardy Plant Society I was fortunate enough to have Jeff Epping tour me around for the day.

Of all the places he promised to take me, I was most excited to see the Epic campus where he has been instrumental in developing their plantings. To be honest, the 1,670 acre campus has to be seen to be believed. And, as you’ll see from the photos below, much of it is fantastical. I asked Jeff why all this effort to make Epic HQ look amazing. He said that the founder Judy Faulkner knew she would be competing for talent with big coastal cities, and she wanted to make Epic an epic place to work.

While much of what you’ll see from these photos is really out of this world, there are still ideas and inspiration to be gleaned. And, the biggest inspiration I took away from seeing the plants and building designs was that we can think differently.

I should note for clarity the buildings have unusual names. I’ve capitalized them to help distinguish their identities, so if you see a random word like Creatures, Library, or Guilds, just know that’s the building’s name.

The first campus we visited was designed with a farm theme. That’s not a barn, but it is a building where employees work. Jeff said that this orchard was around six years old.

Jeff said that most buildings have a signature staircase. In this first one, a Farmall tractor had been disassembled and mounted to the wall.

A map provides a sense of scale of the campus.

The next campus we visited was the Prairie Campus that featured a variety of herbaceous and woody plantings. Jeff told me that every building on campus is connected via skywalks or in the ground tunnels. In Wisconsin during the winter they make sense.

On the Prairie Campus, a number of Lespedeza (bush clover) were in full bloom. He said that they didn’t see any seed on them like further south.

 

In the Indiana Jones tunnel, if you pulled on the figurine, a rolling boulder would sound like it was coming toward you.

 

I noticed a Monarch on a Heptacodium miconioides (seven son flower) and noted to Jeff how I was surprised. He then told me what a pollinator magnet this small tree is, and he said that the tree is often covered with pollinators.

I loved how there were parts on campus where they let the landscape grow a little wild. Here Solidago (goldenrod) and Symphyotrichum (aster) provide a lovely color pairing for autumn.

Jeff said this area was inspired by the beautiful amphitheater at The Scott Arboretum.

Jeff then took me to see the large gravel garden at Epic. The majority of their parking is underground, and with the seamless landscape you would never know there were hundreds of cars below you. In these areas no trees grew since their weight would be so heavy. Instead of just having an area to mow, they got creative with their plantings.

The biggest benefit with the gravel garden is less maintenance. You can see some of the plant diversity in the gravel garden including Parthenium integrifolium (wild quinine) and Echinacea paradoxa (yellow coneflower).

In another section of the gravel garden Salvia yangii (Russian sage, aka Perovskia atriplicifolia) and Baptisia australis (wild indigo) grew as round-mounds amongst the upright grasses. I commented to Jeff how our Baptisia were already dormant and theirs were still green.

To help separate the gravel garden from grass, they had pavers in place.

Closer to the western area, an Asclepias syriaca (common milkweed) was covered in heavy seed capsules.

Schizachyrium scoparium (little bluestem) catch the light in the western-themed area. Jeff told me that most of these grasses had seeded in, and they left them.

More mature Heptacodium miconioides are in bloom much later in Wisconsin than they do for me in Texas.

Outside Kouhoutek was a more Asian themed planting. Many places and roads were named after celestial objects since Judy has a fascination with space.

We then walked toward Wizard’s Academy that was themed after Harry Potter. It looks like a back alleyway in England!

A beautiful allée in Wizard’s Academy is flanked by colorful containers.

 

I really admired their color choices in the containers. They are large enough that even the Cotinus (smokebush) has space to grow.

 

It was at this point that Jeff shared that as they were building campuses, they kept trying to make them from scratch. The suggestion was made to make them modular. Use the same footprint for the buildings so that you automatically know how much supplies you need. And, they can then design them however they want to on the inside or the out.

Fortress was designed to look like some medieval castle.

Guilds was one of the new buildings just constructed. It’s amazing to see the detail on the outside of the building.

The plantings outside Guilds featured a new gravel garden. These have to be watered frequently until the plants establish.

Looking outside you can see the new plantings around Creatures (building to the right). You can see the break between where perennials stop and woody plants start with the break in mulch color and planting density.

The signature staircase in Creatures had to be seen to be believed! A giant dragon was suspended in the stairwell.

Watch out Jeff!

Look at this lovely stained glass window. Except it isn’t! It’s a cloth over a glowing light pillar.

 

As we headed back toward Wizard’s Academy, Jeff took me into Library to see their signature staircase. It resembled a beautiful library.

 

At the bottom of the staircase in Library was this beautiful cutouts of letters.

We stopped for lunch in King’s Cross cafeteria. They had such good and fresh food available for their employees.